In 2025, coding tools like Cursor and VS Code are essential for developers. When comparing cursor vs vscode, the question arises: which one is better? AI coding now generates 41% of all code, revolutionizing the way developers approach their work. Developers require tools that can keep up with this rapid pace. Cursor and VS Code both aim to assist, but they offer distinct advantages. Cursor focuses on innovative AI-driven features, while VS Code is celebrated for its flexibility and reliability. Deciding between cursor vs vscode ultimately depends on your priorities for speed, features, and simplicity.
Cursor's AI tools help you code 57% faster. This makes tasks easier and quicker.
VS Code lets you customize a lot. It works well for both new and skilled coders.
Cursor is easy for beginners with AI help. But it can be harder to learn than VS Code's simpler design.
For big projects, VS Code works better. Cursor is best for small tasks with AI.
Pick Cursor or VS Code based on your needs: fast AI tools or steady and flexible features.
Cursor is a top tool in 2025. It has smart AI features that change how coding feels. Developers love it for its speed and ease of use. One big feature is cutting down on switching tasks. Instead of switching nine times an hour, you only switch twice. This boosts how much you can get done.
Cursor’s AI coding tools are also impressive. For example, making an HTTP server in JavaScript used to take 160 minutes. Now, it only takes 71 minutes. This lets you solve more problems faster—33.7 problems in a week with AI versus 14.9 without it. Cursor doesn’t just save time; it changes how you work.
Debugging is another area where Cursor shines. It reduces debugging time by 42%. This means you spend more time creating and less time fixing. Whether your project is small or huge, Cursor’s AI tools adjust to your needs. It’s a great choice for all developers.
VS Code stays strong as a trusted coding tool. Its many extensions let you make the editor fit your needs. Beginners and experts alike find it useful.
One of its best features is working well with other tools. It connects easily to GitHub, Docker, and more. Its debugging tools are powerful, helping you find and fix problems fast. You can use breakpoints, check the call stack, and inspect variables.
VS Code is also fast and reliable. It handles big projects without slowing down. Its simple design and helpful guides make it great for new coders. At the same time, its advanced tools are perfect for experienced developers.
Cursor and VS Code each have special strengths. Cursor’s AI tools make coding 57% faster and save up to 55% of your time. These features are perfect for developers who want speed and efficiency.
VS Code stands out for its flexibility and connections. While Cursor focuses on AI, VS Code lets you customize your setup with extensions. This makes it a better choice for those who want a traditional coding experience.
Here’s a quick look at their differences:
Feature | Cursor | Visual Studio Code |
---|---|---|
Productivity Gains | 57% faster implementation | N/A |
Debugging Time | 42% reduction | N/A |
Time Savings for Devs | Up to 55% with AI assistance | N/A |
Integration Capabilities | N/A | Extensive |
Learning Curve | Easy | Moderate |
Both Cursor and VS Code are fast tools. Cursor uses AI to speed up tasks like debugging and code writing. It quickly adjusts to your work style, especially for repeated tasks. VS Code is also quick. Its simple design keeps it running smoothly, even with many files or extensions open. But Cursor’s AI makes it faster for developers who use automation a lot.
Resource use matters if your computer has limited power. VS Code manages resources well but can use more CPU with extensions. If it slows down, check the Process Explorer or run code --status
to find the problem. Turning off extra extensions can help. Cursor is built for AI tasks, which need more memory. It works well but may use more memory than VS Code.
Things to think about:
VS Code runs many processes, with extensions using the Extension Host
.
Cursor’s AI needs more memory but boosts productivity.
Big projects can challenge any tool. Cursor is great for simple tasks but struggles with harder ones, needing more tries to get it right. VS Code, a well-known IDE, handles medium tasks easily but needs more manual work. Here’s a quick look:
Tool | Performance Details |
---|---|
Cline | Steady performance, cost-friendly, prevents errors early |
Cursor | Good for simple tasks, struggled with hard ones, needed more tries |
VSCode | Familiar tool, needed more manual work, strong for simple and medium tasks |
For big projects, VS Code feels more dependable. Cursor works best for smaller, AI-focused tasks.
Cursor uses advanced AI tools to make coding easier in 2025. It can change and organize code across big projects quickly. This helps with refactoring, especially for large tasks. But sometimes, it causes problems in complex setups. Fixing these issues can take extra time.
Cursor’s AI also writes big chunks of code for you. This saves time and reduces typing work. However, it can mix human-written and AI-made code. This makes checking the code harder. Even with these challenges, many developers use Cursor to work faster and handle boring tasks easily.
Cursor’s AI features need a lot of computer power. Some users say it uses over 90% memory on a 32GB system. Crashes during normal tasks are another problem. These show that Cursor’s AI tools need to be more stable.
VS Code with Copilot is popular for its steady AI tools. GitHub Copilot works inside VS Code and gives real-time help. It’s easy to use for both new and experienced coders. It boosts productivity without being hard to learn.
VS Code’s AI tools are more stable than Cursor’s. They don’t use too much computer power. For example, Copilot++ adds only 12MB of memory per minute during browsing. This is manageable for most computers. VS Code also works with AI tools like TensorFlow and PyTorch for special tasks.
Cursor is faster and more automated for AI tasks. It can write and fix code across projects better than VS Code. If saving time and solving problems creatively is your goal, Cursor is a good choice. But its crashes and high memory use might be a problem.
VS Code offers a more reliable experience. Its AI tools aren’t as aggressive but are much steadier. If you want a dependable tool with good AI features, VS Code is better. Interestingly, Cursor is based on VS Code, so they share some features.
Choosing between Cursor and VS Code depends on what you need. If you want cutting-edge AI and can handle some instability, pick Cursor. If you prefer a stable tool with solid AI, go with VS Code.
Cursor has a clean and simple design. It helps you focus on coding without distractions. The editor adjusts to how you work, giving helpful tips and shortcuts. You can also change its look and layout. Want a dark mode or special key settings? Cursor lets you do that easily.
Visual Studio Code is very flexible. You can add extensions to change almost anything. Need a new theme? You can get one. Want a Python debugging tool? It’s simple to add. VS Code’s options let you make it your own. If you like customizing, VS Code is a great choice.
Cursor is easy for beginners. Its AI tools help you step by step. It gives tips and even writes small pieces of code for you. If you’re stuck, Cursor’s assistant is there to guide you. It’s like having a teacher in your editor.
Visual Studio Code helps beginners in another way. It has tutorials, tips, and a user-friendly design. You can start with basic features and learn more as you go. Its simple setup won’t confuse you, even if you’re new to coding.
Cursor is great for experienced coders. Its AI tools can fix big parts of code, debug quickly, and guess what you need next. These features save time on tough projects. If you’re in a hurry, Cursor can help you finish faster.
Visual Studio Code is strong for pros too. It works well with tools like Docker and GitHub. You can handle big projects easily. Its debugging tools and built-in terminal give you control and accuracy. It’s a solid choice for detailed work.
For AI coding help, Cursor and VS Code with Copilot are great. Cursor makes coding faster and easier with smart AI tools. It can suggest full functions, create code from plain English, and explain tricky code simply. These tools save time and cut down on boring tasks.
VS Code with Copilot is strong at understanding your project’s needs. It fits into your workflow and turns natural language into working code. While it doesn’t explain code or add in-line notes, it’s steady and dependable.
Here’s a simple comparison of their AI features:
Feature | Cursor AI | VS Code with Copilot |
---|---|---|
Suggests full functions or classes based on context. | Understands project needs for smooth code creation. | |
Natural Language Code Generation | Turns plain English into useful code, great for basics. | Converts natural language into working code. |
Intelligent Refactoring | Improves code by suggesting better ways to write it. | Organizes codebases for better structure. |
In-line Documentation | Adds notes to code for clarity and consistency. | N/A |
Code Explanation | Explains hard-to-read code in simple words. | N/A |
Error Detection and Correction | Spots bugs and suggests fixes before running the code. | N/A |
Language Support | Works with popular languages like Python and JavaScript. | N/A |
If you want advanced AI tools, Cursor is a top pick. But if you need steady and reliable AI, VS Code with Copilot is better.
Big projects can be tough, but both tools have strengths. Cursor works well when it understands your project’s files and setup. It handles tasks better if you give it clear instructions. Its AI manages many parts of a project, especially when you update its context. However, it may slow down with very large projects.
VS Code is a traditional coding tool that handles big projects easily. It needs more manual work but is very reliable. Its debugging tools and links to platforms like GitHub and Docker make it dependable.
Here’s what users say:
Cursor works well with clear project details.
Giving Cursor extra context improves its performance.
Cursor manages many parts of a project with updates.
Cursor slows down with very large projects.
If your project uses a lot of AI, Cursor is helpful. For a steady, hands-on approach, VS Code is the better choice.
Choosing between Cursor and VS Code can be tricky for beginners. Cursor has a simple design and AI tools to guide you step by step. It’s like having a helper to write and fix code. But since it uses advanced features from VS Code, it might feel hard at first. Learning it takes time, but it’s worth it for big projects.
VS Code is beginner-friendly in another way. Its tutorials and easy design make starting simple. You can use basic tools first and learn advanced ones later. It doesn’t have as much AI help as Cursor, but it’s less confusing for new coders.
Here’s what users say:
Cursor feels familiar to experienced coders but tricky for beginners.
Cursor’s chat tool, Bolt, is easy to use, like ChatGPT.
Beginners like Bolt because it helps them code without much experience.
VS Code’s tutorials and simple design are great for new coders.
If you’re ready to learn, Cursor is a strong tool for beginners. But if you want something simpler, VS Code is a good choice.
Developers have mixed thoughts on Cursor. Many like its AI tools that make coding quicker and less boring. Its ability to fix and improve big parts of code saves time. But some don’t like how much memory it uses or that it crashes sometimes. If you’re working on small tasks or have a strong computer, this might not be a problem. For big projects, though, these issues can slow you down.
Cursor’s AI also gets good feedback for explaining code and giving tips. Beginners say it feels like having a teacher in the editor. However, experienced coders think the AI’s advice is too simple for tough tasks. Overall, Cursor is great for speeding up easy work but still needs improvement.
VS Code has been loved by developers for years. It’s flexible and reliable, making it a top pick for beginners and experts. In 2022, a survey showed 74.48% of 71,010 developers used VS Code. That’s a huge number, showing how popular it is.
Developers love its many extensions. Whether you use Python, JavaScript, or Docker, there’s an extension to help. It also works smoothly, even with big projects. While it doesn’t have as many AI tools as Cursor, its GitHub Copilot feature gives steady AI help. If you want a tool that’s stable and easy to customize, VS Code is a great choice.
Both tools have fans and critics. Cursor is praised for its smart AI features. It makes coding and fixing errors easier, especially for beginners. But its high memory use and crashes are common complaints. Some wish it worked better with big projects.
VS Code is loved for being reliable and flexible. Developers enjoy how they can customize it with many extensions. But some think it doesn’t have enough advanced AI tools like Cursor. If you want a tool that’s stable and ready to use, VS Code is a strong option. If you’re curious about new AI coding tools, Cursor could be worth trying.
Choosing between Cursor and VS Code depends on your needs. Cursor is great for smart code suggestions and AI tools. It helps finish repeated tasks faster. But it can be tricky to learn and sometimes slows down. VS Code, on the other hand, is fast, easy to use, and works well for big projects.
Here’s a simple summary:
Feature/Performance | Cursor | VS Code |
---|---|---|
Smart Code Suggestions | Yes | No |
Easy to Customize | Very | Some |
Performance | Okay | Great |
If you want something new, try EZsite AI. It mixes strong AI tools with an easy design. It might be just what you need!
Cursor is great for beginners because of its AI assistant that guides you step by step. It feels like having a coding tutor. VS Code, on the other hand, offers tutorials and a simple interface. If you prefer AI help, go with Cursor. Otherwise, VS Code works well.
Cursor supports popular languages like Python, JavaScript, and Java. However, it might not handle less common languages as effectively. If you’re working with mainstream languages, Cursor’s AI tools will save you time. For niche languages, you might need to rely on manual coding.
Yes, you can! Cursor is built on VS Code, so you can switch between them easily. If you like VS Code’s extensions but want Cursor’s AI features, this combo works perfectly. It’s like getting the best of both worlds.
Cursor’s AI tools need more memory and processing power. A system with at least 16GB RAM is recommended, but 32GB is better for smooth performance. If your computer struggles with heavy tasks, VS Code might be a better option since it uses fewer resources.
Absolutely! While Cursor might feel tricky at first, its AI tools make coding faster and easier once you get the hang of it. If you’re willing to invest some time learning, you’ll see a big boost in productivity. For simpler projects, VS Code is a quicker start.
Top Coding Tools for Positive Vibes in 2025
Top Alternatives to Manus AI for 2025
Leading Replit Alternatives to Explore in 2025